Skip to content
Aporia International

Supporting Leaders through guided critical reflection coaching.

Our non-directive critical reflection coaching supports clearer, more rational decision-making. We help people navigate in the demanding world of professional leadership with clarity and confidence.

Find how we can help you become a more effective and confident leader:

Contact us today

The alarming rise of
Imposter syndrome in leadership.

71%
CEOs
Report experiencing symptoms of imposter syndrome
Korn Ferry (Workforce 2024 Global Insights Report) of over 10,000 buisness leaders.

Imposter syndrome is a psychological pattern in which capable, high-achieving individuals doubt their own competence and fear being exposed as a “fraud,” despite objective evidence of success. This can lead to:

  • Failour to seak internal support
  • Relcutence raise questions or be open to challenge
  • Persistent self-doubt about abilities.
  • Attributing success to luck rather than skill.
  • Fear of being "found out."
  • Perfectionism and overworking to compensate for perceived inadequacy.

Aporia Internaltional can help. Our coaches provide a confidential external route to rational reflection. Helping to align confidence to the avialble information and highligting ways to better understanding.

Find out more about how we can help.

Why Leaders lack deep thinking time.

Leaders work an average of ~62.5 hours per week.

61%
Face-to-Face Interaction
Attending meetings, discussions, presentations.
Harvard Business School (Porter & Nohria) — Detailed Time Use Study
24%
Electronic Communication
Email, messaging, Phone, video calls
Harvard Business School (Porter & Nohria) — Detailed Time Use Study
15%
Paperwork
Reading or writing reports, reponding to workflow items.
Harvard Business School (Porter & Nohria) — Detailed Time Use Study
  • CEOs spend most of their day interacting with people not engaged in independent thinking.
  • Decision-making consumes a substantial portion (~40%) — but it often occurs ad-hoc
  • Deep strategic thinking tends to happen in less structured parts of the day between other tasks, resulting in "noisy mind" thinking which is more susceptible to error.

Aporia International reflection session can help by maximising the deep thinking potential of regular dedicated reflection sessions.

Find out more about how we can help.

Chessboard with pieces

Intelligent mistakes

~5%
Impact of Intelegence on Bias-spotting
Bias-spotting performance is statistically associated with intelligence.
Meta-analysis on intelligence–reasoning relationships: Stanovich et al., Thinking dispositions and intelligence (summarised in )

Leaders routinely make high-stakes decisions that are highly susceptible to cognitive biases. This vulnerability is especially acute in leadership roles, where stress, fatigue, and time pressure increase reliance on fast heuristic thinking, raising the risk of systematic and potentially catastrophic errors.

Research consistently shows that highly capable intelligent individuals overestimate their own objectivity and resistance to bias.

Chessboard with pieces

The immunity illusion

Knowledge of cognitive bias does not confer any immunity, and intelligent people are no less susceptible to bias than anyone else.

Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman, a founder of behavioral economics and a central figure in establishing the empirical study of cognitive bias, wrote:

"I am no better at avoiding these errors than anyone else." — Kahneman, interview discussing Thinking, Fast and Slow (2011)
Chessboard with pieces

Leadership isolation

Leaders find it difficult to discuss their challenges openly due to concerns about confidentiality, judgment, or perceived weakness.

Subordinates are reluctant to challenge senior staff, defer to authority or want to be seen as team players. Peers fear criticism may lead to risking becoming accountable for outcomes or reputation harm. Everyone has a role in the company but also personal ambition that can conflict with open honest discussion.

This isolation makes it hard to identify and mitigate cognitive biases internally.

Third party advisers and consultants are often engaged in providing particular services. The principal-agent problem means that the interests of most external consultants are frequently misaligned with unbiased reason checking.

Let's talk

For leaders who recognise the risks of unexamined confidence, the next step is a private, confidential diagnostic conversation.

Whether epistemic-reflection coaching is appropriate for your decision environment. This is a low-commitment exploratory session designed to assess

Contact us today